Orthoptera Species File (Version 2.0/3.5)
       Home       Search       Taxa       Glossary       Key





Nomenclature


The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN)

It is important that scientists working in different parts of the world and speaking different languages must nevertheless be able to share results of their research without confusion as to what organisms they are talking about.  In other words each species must have a name that is the same throughout the world.  There are many cases where multiple names have been proposed for the same species.  To resolve such matters, it is necessary to have a set of rules that is accepted by taxonomists everywhere.  What we have is the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.  This complex set of rules was developed by the ICZN and adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences.  In addition to rules for determining which name should be used for a species, there are rules for determining whether a new name has been published in an acceptable way and whether the name is eligible to be used.  There are also rules defining circumstances under which an established name will continue in useage even though a different name would be used if we strictly followed priority to use the oldest eligible name.  This is necessary to avoid confusing persons who use the names.  The explanation given here is greatly simplified.  For full details see International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition, published in 1999 by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, c/o The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.

The type system

A central concept of the International Code is use of types as "name bearers."  When scientists describe new species of Orthoptera, they designate one individual for each species as the holotype or name bearer for that species.  This solves two problems.

  1. The published description of a new species is often insufficient to distinguish it from other species that exist in nature but may be unknown to the scientist.  A person studying the matter at a later time can examine the holotype and observe details not mentioned in the original published description.
  2. It often happens that the scientist who describes a new species was looking at several specimens thought to belong to a single species.  Subsequently, more extensive study reveals that the specimens actually belong to multiple species.  The identity of the holotype determines which species keeps the name.

Just as specimens are designated as holotypes for species, species are designated as type species for genera and subgenera. At one time the type species was often called the genotype, but when genotype became widely used in genetics the taxonomists abandoned "genotype" and now use "type species."  The type system also applies at higher levels.  Taxa at ranks above genus up to the rank of superfamily have a type genus.  There is a standard naming convention for these family-group names.  The first step is to determine the "stem" of the type genus (see Article 29 in the ICZN).

These standard endings are required for superfamilies, families and subfamilies.  Adoption at the levels of tribe and subtribe has been slower, and names formed in different ways are also used.

Kinds of types

Various names are used to identify types of different kinds:

Status of names

Names used for taxa can have different status.  In some cases, the names for the status are formally defined by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN).  In actual practice, orthopterists do not always follow a strict interpretation of the rules.  This website has recently implemented the taxonomic status conventions used by the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) database, an active contributor to the Catalogue of Life project.  The website attempts to follow the classification found in the most recent scientific publications covering the topic.  An exception is made for names at higher ranks (usually subfamily and higher).  At higher ranks, different taxonomists sometimes maintain conflicting opinions over many years.  In such cases, this website stays with the traditional interpretation until there seems to be a consensus developing for a newer interpretation.

This website recognizes five basic categories of name status:

Each name status may have one or more attributes (status details) that fall into four types:


       Home       Search       Taxa     Glossary       Key      |      Top of page